For example, I remember back during a Jimquisition, Jim Stephanie Sterling featured a story about a developer who stole music I think from an artist and refused to pay them for it or something like that. Thisi s gonna be off topic, but something I've noticed is that when you get a person who is disliked enough, even among progressive communities, regressive instincts come out. Doug sucks so much at so many things, but his face has nothing to do with it. So, being mindful of that, punchable face is not the best insult to use against anyone. Jim thought they could write a story attacking a developer for the similar bad actions that they've attacked dozens of other developers for doing without igniting a harassment campaign against a woman because their audience was not like that, and they weren't.until they were. It kind of highlights how abusive language tends to not be the solely due to personal beliefs but simply because they often come from societal inequalities, and people will use bigoted language not only if they believe bigoted things, but whether bigoted language can be advantageous to them in a particular moment. In fact, I just saw Jim's twitter getting a few threats of violence because according to them Jim is so ugly that they warrant it, so it's something most progressive crowds eschew from.except it creeps back up when we have someone we can treat as a common enemy, like Doug. So, whereas "Punchable face" is usually an alt-right thing nowadays because the term is rooted in that the idea that men can look a certain way as a way of deserving to be punched, and that mentality tends to crop up in really distasteful areas. They (meaning Jim/Stephanie) deleted the video and then posted a reaction video to explain why they had to remove the video and how disappointed they were in their community that they went on to harass the woman. Except this developer was a woman, so suddenly the Jimquisitions otherwise progressive community got real misogynistic real fast, instantly launching a harassment campaign.
Take what works, leave behind what doesn't and don't let it bother you.Ĭlick to shrink.Thisi s gonna be off topic, but something I've noticed is that when you get a person who is disliked enough, even among progressive communities, regressive instincts come out. House is my favorite show, and I'd love a good multi-hour deep dive, but the video just wasn't saying anything that I cared to hear, so I dropped it. But I also managed to bounce off a similar long review of House that just didn't click for me. I've greatly enjoyed watching the Joseph Anderson 4+ hour long reviews of both The Witcher 1 and 2, which are games that I don't particularly care for.
Heart punch nostalgia critic gif movie#
Watching these videos is like a long conversation about a movie or a game that I can no longer have directly with a person, because I literally can't. For me, during the days of COVID and barely seeing or talking directly to my friends, they occupy an almost conversational space for me. I think that's the core reality people need to accept about all of this long form Youtube content. That it can hook me in and make me sit here for almost an hour watching a video about a video I've never seen about a movie I've never seen, then it must be something special or something I like. If I truly don't care, I won't watch them. Videos like this one occupy a weird space in my mind.
0 kommentar(er)
